Friday, September 11, 2009

For the Lost

by L.F. Gerace

Why was I so lucky
allowed to remain
my life spared, unbroken

Helplessly watching
their desperate finality
burning, collapse, devastation

Grieving for the ones
left behind to wonder
why the most painful questions
have no real answers here

Still struggling to overcome the sorrow
indelible, inescapable, relentless
while trying to be present
in every moment of every day

Living in a world in such need of humanity
makes me wonder today
if hate might not be stronger than love

But live your life
and revel in the good…
the lost would not want it to end this way

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Spontanious Outburst.....NOT!

Rep. Joe Wilson (R) of South Carolina, the genius who shouted, "you lie," during President Obama's health care speech. Even an irreverent upstart like me was astounded that anyone could be so directly disrespectful to the President, and in that chamber! I'm sure his fellow republicans are really proud of him today. Now that he has apologized to the President, will this just become part of the jetsam and flotsam of Washington politics, or will it reverberate deeper?

Complete Text of President Obama's Health Care Speech

The following is the complete text of President Obana's speech given September 9, 2009 to a joint session of congress regarding the need for health care reform in the United States.
Madam Speaker, Vice President Biden, members of Congress, and the American people:

When I spoke here last winter, this nation was facing the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. We were losing an average of 700,000 jobs per month. Credit was frozen. And our financial system was on the verge of collapse.

As any American who is still looking for work or a way to pay their bills will tell you, we are by no means out of the woods. A full and vibrant recovery is still many months away. And I will not let up until those Americans who seek jobs can find them -- (applause) -- until those businesses that seek capital and credit can thrive; until all responsible homeowners can stay in their homes. That is our ultimate goal. But thanks to the bold and decisive action we've taken since January, I can stand here with confidence and say that we have pulled this economy back from the brink. (Applause.)

I want to thank the members of this body for your efforts and your support in these last several months, and especially those who've taken the difficult votes that have put us on a path to recovery. I also want to thank the American people for their patience and resolve during this trying time for our nation.

But we did not come here just to clean up crises. We came here to build a future. (Applause.) So tonight, I return to speak to all of you about an issue that is central to that future -- and that is the issue of health care.

I am not the first President to take up this cause, but I am determined to be the last. (Applause.) It has now been nearly a century since Theodore Roosevelt first called for health care reform. And ever since, nearly every President and Congress, whether Democrat or Republican, has attempted to meet this challenge in some way. A bill for comprehensive health reform was first introduced by John Dingell Sr. in 1943. Sixty-five years later, his son continues to introduce that same bill at the beginning of each session. (Applause.)

Our collective failure to meet this challenge -- year after year, decade after decade -- has led us to the breaking point. Everyone understands the extraordinary hardships that are placed on the uninsured, who live every day just one accident or illness away from bankruptcy. These are not primarily people on welfare. These are middle-class Americans. Some can't get insurance on the job. Others are self-employed, and can't afford it, since buying insurance on your own costs you three times as much as the coverage you get from your employer. Many other Americans who are willing and able to pay are still denied insurance due to previous illnesses or conditions that insurance companies decide are too risky or too expensive to cover.

We are the only democracy -- the only advanced democracy on Earth -- the only wealthy nation -- that allows such hardship for millions of its people. There are now more than 30 million American citizens who cannot get coverage. In just a two-year period, one in every three Americans goes without health care coverage at some point. And every day, 14,000 Americans lose their coverage. In other words, it can happen to anyone.

But the problem that plagues the health care system is not just a problem for the uninsured. Those who do have insurance have never had less security and stability than they do today. More and more Americans worry that if you move, lose your job, or change your job, you'll lose your health insurance too. More and more Americans pay their premiums, only to discover that their insurance company has dropped their coverage when they get sick, or won't pay the full cost of care. It happens every day.

One man from Illinois lost his coverage in the middle of chemotherapy because his insurer found that he hadn't reported gallstones that he didn't even know about. They delayed his treatment, and he died because of it. Another woman from Texas was about to get a double mastectomy when her insurance company canceled her policy because she forgot to declare a case of acne. By the time she had her insurance reinstated, her breast cancer had more than doubled in size. That is heart-breaking, it is wrong, and no one should be treated that way in the United States of America. (Applause.)

Then there's the problem of rising cost. We spend one and a half times more per person on health care than any other country, but we aren't any healthier for it. This is one of the reasons that insurance premiums have gone up three times faster than wages. It's why so many employers -- especially small businesses -- are forcing their employees to pay more for insurance, or are dropping their coverage entirely. It's why so many aspiring entrepreneurs cannot afford to open a business in the first place, and why American businesses that compete internationally -- like our automakers -- are at a huge disadvantage. And it's why those of us with health insurance are also paying a hidden and growing tax for those without it -- about $1,000 per year that pays for somebody else's emergency room and charitable care.

Finally, our health care system is placing an unsustainable burden on taxpayers. When health care costs grow at the rate they have, it puts greater pressure on programs like Medicare and Medicaid. If we do nothing to slow these skyrocketing costs, we will eventually be spending more on Medicare and Medicaid than every other government program combined. Put simply, our health care problem is our deficit problem. Nothing else even comes close. Nothing else. (Applause.)

Now, these are the facts. Nobody disputes them. We know we must reform this system. The question is how.

There are those on the left who believe that the only way to fix the system is through a single-payer system like Canada's -- (applause) -- where we would severely restrict the private insurance market and have the government provide coverage for everybody. On the right, there are those who argue that we should end employer-based systems and leave individuals to buy health insurance on their own.

I've said -- I have to say that there are arguments to be made for both these approaches. But either one would represent a radical shift that would disrupt the health care most people currently have. Since health care represents one-sixth of our economy, I believe it makes more sense to build on what works and fix what doesn't, rather than try to build an entirely new system from scratch. (Applause.) And that is precisely what those of you in Congress have tried to do over the past several months.

During that time, we've seen Washington at its best and at its worst.

We've seen many in this chamber work tirelessly for the better part of this year to offer thoughtful ideas about how to achieve reform. Of the five committees asked to develop bills, four have completed their work, and the Senate Finance Committee announced today that it will move forward next week. That has never happened before. Our overall efforts have been supported by an unprecedented coalition of doctors and nurses; hospitals, seniors' groups, and even drug companies -- many of whom opposed reform in the past. And there is agreement in this chamber on about 80 percent of what needs to be done, putting us closer to the goal of reform than we have ever been.

But what we've also seen in these last months is the same partisan spectacle that only hardens the disdain many Americans have towards their own government. Instead of honest debate, we've seen scare tactics. Some have dug into unyielding ideological camps that offer no hope of compromise. Too many have used this as an opportunity to score short-term political points, even if it robs the country of our opportunity to solve a long-term challenge. And out of this blizzard of charges and counter-charges, confusion has reigned.

Well, the time for bickering is over. The time for games has passed. (Applause.) Now is the season for action. Now is when we must bring the best ideas of both parties together, and show the American people that we can still do what we were sent here to do. Now is the time to deliver on health care. Now is the time to deliver on health care.

The plan I'm announcing tonight would meet three basic goals. It will provide more security and stability to those who have health insurance. It will provide insurance for those who don't. And it will slow the growth of health care costs for our families, our businesses, and our government. (Applause.) It's a plan that asks everyone to take responsibility for meeting this challenge -- not just government, not just insurance companies, but everybody including employers and individuals. And it's a plan that incorporates ideas from senators and congressmen, from Democrats and Republicans -- and yes, from some of my opponents in both the primary and general election.

Here are the details that every American needs to know about this plan. First, if you are among the hundreds of millions of Americans who already have health insurance through your job, or Medicare, or Medicaid, or the VA, nothing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have. (Applause.) Let me repeat this: Nothing in our plan requires you to change what you have.

What this plan will do is make the insurance you have work better for you. Under this plan, it will be against the law for insurance companies to deny you coverage because of a preexisting condition. (Applause.) As soon as I sign this bill, it will be against the law for insurance companies to drop your coverage when you get sick or water it down when you need it the most. (Applause.) They will no longer be able to place some arbitrary cap on the amount of coverage you can receive in a given year or in a lifetime. (Applause.) We will place a limit on how much you can be charged for out-of-pocket expenses, because in the United States of America, no one should go broke because they get sick. (Applause.) And insurance companies will be required to cover, with no extra charge, routine checkups and preventive care, like mammograms and colonoscopies -- (applause) -- because there's no reason we shouldn't be catching diseases like breast cancer and colon cancer before they get worse. That makes sense, it saves money, and it saves lives. (Applause.)

Now, that's what Americans who have health insurance can expect from this plan -- more security and more stability.

Now, if you're one of the tens of millions of Americans who don't currently have health insurance, the second part of this plan will finally offer you quality, affordable choices. (Applause.) If you lose your job or you change your job, you'll be able to get coverage. If you strike out on your own and start a small business, you'll be able to get coverage. We'll do this by creating a new insurance exchange -- a marketplace where individuals and small businesses will be able to shop for health insurance at competitive prices. Insurance companies will have an incentive to participate in this exchange because it lets them compete for millions of new customers. As one big group, these customers will have greater leverage to bargain with the insurance companies for better prices and quality coverage. This is how large companies and government employees get affordable insurance. It's how everyone in this Congress gets affordable insurance. And it's time to give every American the same opportunity that we give ourselves. (Applause.)

Now, for those individuals and small businesses who still can't afford the lower-priced insurance available in the exchange, we'll provide tax credits, the size of which will be based on your need. And all insurance companies that want access to this new marketplace will have to abide by the consumer protections I already mentioned. This exchange will take effect in four years, which will give us time to do it right. In the meantime, for those Americans who can't get insurance today because they have preexisting medical conditions, we will immediately offer low-cost coverage that will protect you against financial ruin if you become seriously ill. (Applause.) This was a good idea when Senator John McCain proposed it in the campaign, it's a good idea now, and we should all embrace it. (Applause.)

Now, even if we provide these affordable options, there may be those -- especially the young and the healthy -- who still want to take the risk and go without coverage. There may still be companies that refuse to do right by their workers by giving them coverage. The problem is, such irresponsible behavior costs all the rest of us money. If there are affordable options and people still don't sign up for health insurance, it means we pay for these people's expensive emergency room visits. If some businesses don't provide workers health care, it forces the rest of us to pick up the tab when their workers get sick, and gives those businesses an unfair advantage over their competitors. And unless everybody does their part, many of the insurance reforms we seek -- especially requiring insurance companies to cover preexisting conditions -- just can't be achieved.

And that's why under my plan, individuals will be required to carry basic health insurance -- just as most states require you to carry auto insurance. (Applause.) Likewise -- likewise, businesses will be required to either offer their workers health care, or chip in to help cover the cost of their workers. There will be a hardship waiver for those individuals who still can't afford coverage, and 95 percent of all small businesses, because of their size and narrow profit margin, would be exempt from these requirements. (Applause.) But we can't have large businesses and individuals who can afford coverage game the system by avoiding responsibility to themselves or their employees. Improving our health care system only works if everybody does their part.

And while there remain some significant details to be ironed out, I believe -- (laughter) -- I believe a broad consensus exists for the aspects of the plan I just outlined: consumer protections for those with insurance, an exchange that allows individuals and small businesses to purchase affordable coverage, and a requirement that people who can afford insurance get insurance.

And I have no doubt that these reforms would greatly benefit Americans from all walks of life, as well as the economy as a whole. Still, given all the misinformation that's been spread over the past few months, I realize -- (applause) -- I realize that many Americans have grown nervous about reform. So tonight I want to address some of the key controversies that are still out there.

Some of people's concerns have grown out of bogus claims spread by those whose only agenda is to kill reform at any cost. The best example is the claim made not just by radio and cable talk show hosts, but by prominent politicians, that we plan to set up panels of bureaucrats with the power to kill off senior citizens. Now, such a charge would be laughable if it weren't so cynical and irresponsible. It is a lie, plain and simple. (Applause.)

There are also those who claim that our reform efforts would insure illegal immigrants. This, too, is false. The reforms -- the reforms I'm proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: You lie! (Boos.)

THE PRESIDENT: It's not true. And one more misunderstanding I want to clear up -- under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions, and federal conscience laws will remain in place. (Applause.)

Now, my health care proposal has also been attacked by some who oppose reform as a "government takeover" of the entire health care system. As proof, critics point to a provision in our plan that allows the uninsured and small businesses to choose a publicly sponsored insurance option, administered by the government just like Medicaid or Medicare. (Applause.)

So let me set the record straight here. My guiding principle is, and always has been, that consumers do better when there is choice and competition. That's how the market works. (Applause.) Unfortunately, in 34 states, 75 percent of the insurance market is controlled by five or fewer companies. In Alabama, almost 90 percent is controlled by just one company. And without competition, the price of insurance goes up and quality goes down. And it makes it easier for insurance companies to treat their customers badly -- by cherry-picking the healthiest individuals and trying to drop the sickest, by overcharging small businesses who have no leverage, and by jacking up rates.

Insurance executives don't do this because they're bad people; they do it because it's profitable. As one former insurance executive testified before Congress, insurance companies are not only encouraged to find reasons to drop the seriously ill, they are rewarded for it. All of this is in service of meeting what this former executive called "Wall Street's relentless profit expectations."

Now, I have no interest in putting insurance companies out of business. They provide a legitimate service, and employ a lot of our friends and neighbors. I just want to hold them accountable. (Applause.) And the insurance reforms that I've already mentioned would do just that. But an additional step we can take to keep insurance companies honest is by making a not-for-profit public option available in the insurance exchange. (Applause.) Now, let me be clear. Let me be clear. It would only be an option for those who don't have insurance. No one would be forced to choose it, and it would not impact those of you who already have insurance. In fact, based on Congressional Budget Office estimates, we believe that less than 5 percent of Americans would sign up.

Despite all this, the insurance companies and their allies don't like this idea. They argue that these private companies can't fairly compete with the government. And they'd be right if taxpayers were subsidizing this public insurance option. But they won't be. I've insisted that like any private insurance company, the public insurance option would have to be self-sufficient and rely on the premiums it collects. But by avoiding some of the overhead that gets eaten up at private companies by profits and excessive administrative costs and executive salaries, it could provide a good deal for consumers, and would also keep pressure on private insurers to keep their policies affordable and treat their customers better, the same way public colleges and universities provide additional choice and competition to students without in any way inhibiting a vibrant system of private colleges and universities. (Applause.)

Now, it is -- it's worth noting that a strong majority of Americans still favor a public insurance option of the sort I've proposed tonight. But its impact shouldn't be exaggerated -- by the left or the right or the media. It is only one part of my plan, and shouldn't be used as a handy excuse for the usual Washington ideological battles. To my progressive friends, I would remind you that for decades, the driving idea behind reform has been to end insurance company abuses and make coverage available for those without it. (Applause.) The public option -- the public option is only a means to that end -- and we should remain open to other ideas that accomplish our ultimate goal. And to my Republican friends, I say that rather than making wild claims about a government takeover of health care, we should work together to address any legitimate concerns you may have. (Applause.)

For example -- for example, some have suggested that the public option go into effect only in those markets where insurance companies are not providing affordable policies. Others have proposed a co-op or another non-profit entity to administer the plan. These are all constructive ideas worth exploring. But I will not back down on the basic principle that if Americans can't find affordable coverage, we will provide you with a choice. (Applause.) And I will make sure that no government bureaucrat or insurance company bureaucrat gets between you and the care that you need. (Applause.)

Finally, let me discuss an issue that is a great concern to me, to members of this chamber, and to the public -- and that's how we pay for this plan.

And here's what you need to know. First, I will not sign a plan that adds one dime to our deficits -- either now or in the future. (Applause.) I will not sign it if it adds one dime to the deficit, now or in the future, period. And to prove that I'm serious, there will be a provision in this plan that requires us to come forward with more spending cuts if the savings we promised don't materialize. (Applause.) Now, part of the reason I faced a trillion-dollar deficit when I walked in the door of the White House is because too many initiatives over the last decade were not paid for -- from the Iraq war to tax breaks for the wealthy. (Applause.) I will not make that same mistake with health care.

Second, we've estimated that most of this plan can be paid for by finding savings within the existing health care system, a system that is currently full of waste and abuse. Right now, too much of the hard-earned savings and tax dollars we spend on health care don't make us any healthier. That's not my judgment -- it's the judgment of medical professionals across this country. And this is also true when it comes to Medicare and Medicaid.

In fact, I want to speak directly to seniors for a moment, because Medicare is another issue that's been subjected to demagoguery and distortion during the course of this debate.

More than four decades ago, this nation stood up for the principle that after a lifetime of hard work, our seniors should not be left to struggle with a pile of medical bills in their later years. That's how Medicare was born. And it remains a sacred trust that must be passed down from one generation to the next. (Applause.) And that is why not a dollar of the Medicare trust fund will be used to pay for this plan. (Applause.)

The only thing this plan would eliminate is the hundreds of billions of dollars in waste and fraud, as well as unwarranted subsidies in Medicare that go to insurance companies -- subsidies that do everything to pad their profits but don't improve the care of seniors. And we will also create an independent commission of doctors and medical experts charged with identifying more waste in the years ahead. (Applause.)

Now, these steps will ensure that you -- America's seniors -- get the benefits you've been promised. They will ensure that Medicare is there for future generations. And we can use some of the savings to fill the gap in coverage that forces too many seniors to pay thousands of dollars a year out of their own pockets for prescription drugs. (Applause.) That's what this plan will do for you. So don't pay attention to those scary stories about how your benefits will be cut, especially since some of the same folks who are spreading these tall tales have fought against Medicare in the past and just this year supported a budget that would essentially have turned Medicare into a privatized voucher program. That will not happen on my watch. I will protect Medicare. (Applause.)

Now, because Medicare is such a big part of the health care system, making the program more efficient can help usher in changes in the way we deliver health care that can reduce costs for everybody. We have long known that some places -- like the Intermountain Healthcare in Utah or the Geisinger Health System in rural Pennsylvania -- offer high-quality care at costs below average. So the commission can help encourage the adoption of these common-sense best practices by doctors and medical professionals throughout the system -- everything from reducing hospital infection rates to encouraging better coordination between teams of doctors.

Reducing the waste and inefficiency in Medicare and Medicaid will pay for most of this plan. (Applause.) Now, much of the rest would be paid for with revenues from the very same drug and insurance companies that stand to benefit from tens of millions of new customers. And this reform will charge insurance companies a fee for their most expensive policies, which will encourage them to provide greater value for the money -- an idea which has the support of Democratic and Republican experts. And according to these same experts, this modest change could help hold down the cost of health care for all of us in the long run.

Now, finally, many in this chamber -- particularly on the Republican side of the aisle -- have long insisted that reforming our medical malpractice laws can help bring down the cost of health care. (Applause.) Now -- there you go. There you go. Now, I don't believe malpractice reform is a silver bullet, but I've talked to enough doctors to know that defensive medicine may be contributing to unnecessary costs. (Applause.) So I'm proposing that we move forward on a range of ideas about how to put patient safety first and let doctors focus on practicing medicine. (Applause.) I know that the Bush administration considered authorizing demonstration projects in individual states to test these ideas. I think it's a good idea, and I'm directing my Secretary of Health and Human Services to move forward on this initiative today. (Applause.)

Now, add it all up, and the plan I'm proposing will cost around $900 billion over 10 years -- less than we have spent on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and less than the tax cuts for the wealthiest few Americans that Congress passed at the beginning of the previous administration. (Applause.) Now, most of these costs will be paid for with money already being spent -- but spent badly -- in the existing health care system. The plan will not add to our deficit. The middle class will realize greater security, not higher taxes. And if we are able to slow the growth of health care costs by just one-tenth of 1 percent each year -- one-tenth of 1 percent -- it will actually reduce the deficit by $4 trillion over the long term.

Now, this is the plan I'm proposing. It's a plan that incorporates ideas from many of the people in this room tonight -- Democrats and Republicans. And I will continue to seek common ground in the weeks ahead. If you come to me with a serious set of proposals, I will be there to listen. My door is always open.

But know this: I will not waste time with those who have made the calculation that it's better politics to kill this plan than to improve it. (Applause.) I won't stand by while the special interests use the same old tactics to keep things exactly the way they are. If you misrepresent what's in this plan, we will call you out. (Applause.) And I will not -- and I will not accept the status quo as a solution. Not this time. Not now.

Everyone in this room knows what will happen if we do nothing. Our deficit will grow. More families will go bankrupt. More businesses will close. More Americans will lose their coverage when they are sick and need it the most. And more will die as a result. We know these things to be true.

That is why we cannot fail. Because there are too many Americans counting on us to succeed -- the ones who suffer silently, and the ones who shared their stories with us at town halls, in e-mails, and in letters.

I received one of those letters a few days ago. It was from our beloved friend and colleague, Ted Kennedy. He had written it back in May, shortly after he was told that his illness was terminal. He asked that it be delivered upon his death.

In it, he spoke about what a happy time his last months were, thanks to the love and support of family and friends, his wife, Vicki, his amazing children, who are all here tonight. And he expressed confidence that this would be the year that health care reform -- "that great unfinished business of our society," he called it -- would finally pass. He repeated the truth that health care is decisive for our future prosperity, but he also reminded me that "it concerns more than material things." "What we face," he wrote, "is above all a moral issue; at stake are not just the details of policy, but fundamental principles of social justice and the character of our country."

I've thought about that phrase quite a bit in recent days -- the character of our country. One of the unique and wonderful things about America has always been our self-reliance, our rugged individualism, our fierce defense of freedom and our healthy skepticism of government. And figuring out the appropriate size and role of government has always been a source of rigorous and, yes, sometimes angry debate. That's our history.

For some of Ted Kennedy's critics, his brand of liberalism represented an affront to American liberty. In their minds, his passion for universal health care was nothing more than a passion for big government.

But those of us who knew Teddy and worked with him here -- people of both parties -- know that what drove him was something more. His friend Orrin Hatch -- he knows that. They worked together to provide children with health insurance. His friend John McCain knows that. They worked together on a Patient's Bill of Rights. His friend Chuck Grassley knows that. They worked together to provide health care to children with disabilities.

On issues like these, Ted Kennedy's passion was born not of some rigid ideology, but of his own experience. It was the experience of having two children stricken with cancer. He never forgot the sheer terror and helplessness that any parent feels when a child is badly sick. And he was able to imagine what it must be like for those without insurance, what it would be like to have to say to a wife or a child or an aging parent, there is something that could make you better, but I just can't afford it.

That large-heartedness -- that concern and regard for the plight of others -- is not a partisan feeling. It's not a Republican or a Democratic feeling. It, too, is part of the American character -- our ability to stand in other people's shoes; a recognition that we are all in this together, and when fortune turns against one of us, others are there to lend a helping hand; a belief that in this country, hard work and responsibility should be rewarded by some measure of security and fair play; and an acknowledgment that sometimes government has to step in to help deliver on that promise.

This has always been the history of our progress. In 1935, when over half of our seniors could not support themselves and millions had seen their savings wiped away, there were those who argued that Social Security would lead to socialism, but the men and women of Congress stood fast, and we are all the better for it. In 1965, when some argued that Medicare represented a government takeover of health care, members of Congress -- Democrats and Republicans -- did not back down. They joined together so that all of us could enter our golden years with some basic peace of mind.

You see, our predecessors understood that government could not, and should not, solve every problem. They understood that there are instances when the gains in security from government action are not worth the added constraints on our freedom. But they also understood that the danger of too much government is matched by the perils of too little; that without the leavening hand of wise policy, markets can crash, monopolies can stifle competition, the vulnerable can be exploited. And they knew that when any government measure, no matter how carefully crafted or beneficial, is subject to scorn; when any efforts to help people in need are attacked as un-American; when facts and reason are thrown overboard and only timidity passes for wisdom, and we can no longer even engage in a civil conversation with each other over the things that truly matter -- that at that point we don't merely lose our capacity to solve big challenges. We lose something essential about ourselves.

That was true then. It remains true today. I understand how difficult this health care debate has been. I know that many in this country are deeply skeptical that government is looking out for them. I understand that the politically safe move would be to kick the can further down the road -- to defer reform one more year, or one more election, or one more term.

But that is not what the moment calls for. That's not what we came here to do. We did not come to fear the future. We came here to shape it. I still believe we can act even when it's hard. (Applause.) I still believe -- I still believe that we can act when it's hard. I still believe we can replace acrimony with civility, and gridlock with progress. I still believe we can do great things, and that here and now we will meet history's test.

Because that's who we are. That is our calling. That is our character. Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America. (Applause.)


Thursday, July 24, 2008

Fossil Fools

This op-ed in today's NY Times that is absolutely not to be missed, especially if you DON'T think that drilling for oil will help us in the short term - or at all.

Lost Horizon

Before I say anything here, I want to acknowledge the passing of a great man - someone who will be missed by all who value truth, journalistic integrity and responsibility - Tim Russert.
Meet the Press may never be the same, but the values - the best sense of tough but fair interviewing in electronic media - are still the cornerstone of that show - thank goodness for us all.


Just a few random thoughts. Hmmm...where to begin?.......

How about the "General Time Horizon" Shrub 43's administration is looking at right now? (A troop withdrawal by any other name thank god). This playing with the language in order to diminish a situation, or in this case jerk us around, or to scare us into submission, is one of the most fascinating and heinous things about this administration. Jeez, if you're going to try to propagandize something, at least don't be so fricken obvious. I'm exhausted from having my intelligence insulted.

General Time Horizon - sounds like a super hero of some sort - like he should have a side kick...General Time Horizon and Aspirational Goal Boy.


It seems Sen. McCain views the Iraq war through a WWII prizm - like somehow we (or any side for that matter, can acually "win the war" in Iraq. The complexities of today's post cold war world do not lend themselves easily to being cast in black and white. There are no definitive winners or losers anymore. It's all nuanced shades of grey; compromises that make everyone feel like they've gained something. (Maybe wars can be fought in board rooms from now on). This viewpoint is one of the main problems with McCain. It's like "Mission Accomplished" all over again.

Let's move on to Phil Grahme, an economic advisor to McCain who didn't help things a bit for him by recently calling us a "Nation of Whiners" and telling us that we're only suffering from a "mental recession." McCain needs this like he needs to go back to the Hanoi Hilton for a massage.
Which brings us to the disarray that is the McCain campaign. Here we have Sen. Big John, (who is considering self immoliation to get some press coverage), riding around in a golf cart with the original Kinnibunkport Cowboy Bush 41, looking like Former President Yesterday and Senator Last Week, who can't seem to put a dent in Obama's wall of press coverage. With 'Bama looking like he's already won the election, and McCain bitching about the press being slanted Obama's way ...well, let's just say McCain needs some serious campaign strategy - not to mention some better photo ops, say, with someone under 75 years old.

I have an idea which I think might help Sen. McCain (unlike the steady stream of seemingly disengaged campaign bobble-head dolls coming and going). Why not a citizen campaign manager? You know, someone who follows politics from outside the beltway and can actually give some some perspective. Someone who could help get more than one reporter to show up when McCain arrives in New Hampshire for a town hall meeting. (I kid you not - this actally happened and "the picture" of the Senator coming off the plane to this underwhelming reception was none too flattering.

More later...maybe.

Saturday, October 20, 2007

Humminah, Humminah

75 year old Rep. Pete Stark (D) - CA

"You don't have money to fund the war or children. But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement."

Stark should apologize, no doubt about that. Then his San Francisco Bay constituents should start looking for a new Representative who isn't

Thursday, October 18, 2007

Stick this in your Veto!

I simply can not believe that senate democrats could not muster the nine votes needed to veto proof the S-CHIP (State Children's Health Insurance Program) bill voted on today, which proposed a $35B spending increase over 5 years.

The cost of the Iraq war is $2B...PER WEEK! And that was in 2006!!

The program, which currently costs $5B per year, would enable the federal government and the states to subsidize the cost of health coverage for families who find themselves in a "grey area," earning too much to qualify for Medicaid, but not enough to afford private health insurance.

The shrubbery currently inhabiting the oval office has said that the bill, which was passed by a two-thirds majority in congress, encourages families with higher incomes to drop private coverage so that they can get their insurance paid for by the government.

Democratic Congressman John Dingell of Michigan said that more than 90 percent of families covered earn less than $41,300 for a family of four, which is the income range the program was originally designed to help. "There will be no wealthy people covered," Dingell advised.

Is is still possible for the Kinnebunkport Cowboy to redeem himself after screwing the American people (this time it's mostly children) on issue after issue???

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Answer: 24% - Question...

How much of the American Public approves of current U.S. President what's his name.

Let me rhymes with swoosh (or was that "slam dunk").

The shrinking shrubbery held what he considers a press conference today. It was pretty much the usual performance - mugging for the camera, laughing at his own halting, un-presidential demeanor, evading questions, showing how irrelevant he is - until he said the following:

"So I’ve told people that if you’re interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from have the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon. I take the threat of Iran with a nuclear weapon very seriously."

Now let's try something here. Ready? If we substitute the word "Iran" in the above quote, with the word "Iraq," does it seem like something we've all heard before?

In the words of Ronald Reagan, "there he goes again," only this time - it's not funny.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

"A Nightmare With No End In Sight"

Will "we're making progress" go the way of "stay the course?"

Retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, the former commander of coalition forces in Iraq seems to think so...

Saturday, September 22, 2007

Back Before the Soundbite

This is a great article by Joe Klein. I should have posted it long ago.

It begins to explain how people like Karl Rove came to be, and how presidents are now crafted to tell you - exactly - what you want to hear.

Pssst! Who's Behind the Decline of Politics...

Monday, August 20, 2007

"He Got Out While the Getting was Good"

So the Dr. Frankenstein of the Republican Party is suddenly compelled to "spend more time with his family."

A pretty unceremonious departure, but I guess ducking out during the haze of August is better than having a torch bearing mob gather at your residence. Let's face it, the unmistakable scent of kerosene has been hanging heavy in the air for some time now.

The aftermath of what was his crowning achievement reiterates for the world that you can "bring a horse to water, but you can't make it think."

Frank Rich will fill you in:

He Got Out While the Getting Was Good

Sunday, August 12, 2007

Shuffling Off to Crawford, 2007 Edition - Frank Rich

It's Sunday.

Need I say more...

Frank Rich 8/12/07


Sunday, July 29, 2007

Intestinal Echo

Frank Rich inquires Who Really Took Over During That Colonoscopy in today's NY Times.

Sunday, July 22, 2007

This is the Republicans...



Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Bush's Fleurs du Mal

Let's hear from Maureen Dowd, who's take on this administration is as scathing as it is spot on.

Bush's Fleurs du Mal

Sunday, May 27, 2007

Remember Me

by L.F. Gerace

You wrap yourself up in the flag
like this wood box that I lay in
Did god whisper it to you one day
or did he tell you while you were prayin’?

My blood flowed into the sand
of a fractured, hostile land
Did I die for their freedom or an empty threat
while you carelessly tossed around epithets?

Fighting for your honor
or your personal crusade?
Can you sleep peacefully now
in this bed that you’ve made?

Will you even remember me?
I fought and died to make them free
I hope that comforts my family

You said 2,000 dead was not a milestone
Will you be writing the letter home?
Or will you be too busy
speaking empty slogans into a microphone?

Is your only point of view
To continue the path we’re riding?
Does no one else see the abyss
into which we are sliding?
It’s my time that you’re biding

Will you tell her face to face
or over the phone?
You’ll blow taps, thank her,
hand her a flag
and go home

Remember me
As a defender of liberty
Remember me
To my children
So they can somehow
Remember me

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

#2's #1 GUILTY


Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Redefined Madness

Wednesday, December 27, 2006

Dead Presidents

Monday, December 11, 2006

The Sunshine Boys Can't Save Iraq

Nothing but superlatives for Frank Rich, whose glasses need no tint. He seems to see reality quite clearly.

The Sunshine Boys Can't Save Iraq

Monday, December 04, 2006

Has He Started Talking to the Walls?

Here is Mr. Frank Rich of the New York Times, once again saying ever so adroitly what we all feel.

Has He Started Talking to the Walls?

Friday, December 01, 2006

Random Thoughts


“He’s the Right Guy for Iraq”
Referring to Iraq Prime Minister al-Maliki

"I know her heart, I know her character. I am confident that Harriet Miers will add to the wisdom and character of our judiciary when she is confirmed as the 110th justice of the Supreme Court."
Need I say more

"I know there´s a lot of speculation that these reports in Washington mean there´s going to be some kind of graceful exit out of Iraq. This business about a graceful exit just simply has no realism to it whatsoever. We´re going to stay in Iraq to get the job done as long as the government wants us there."
... Uh-huh

"I Will Not Withdraw Even If Laura And Barney Are The Only Ones Supporting Me."


“We’ll succeed unless we quit.”
During his first visit to Vietnam

"I cannot answer on behalf of the U.S. administration but I can tell you that from our side our forces will be ready by June 2007," al-Maliki told ABC television after meeting President Bush in Jordan." - (November 2006)

"If the political process continues to go positively, if the developments with the [Iraqi] security forces continue to go as it is going, we will still be able to make fairly substantial reductions after these elections, in the spring and summer of next year." Gen. Casey - (July 2005)

Some Recent Govern-mental Euphemisms

Hunger = food insecurity

Civil War = new phase of sectarian violence

Troop Withdrawal = troop re-deployment

W. is just getting back from his “productive only in the photo-op sense" Middle East get away, where nothing was accomplished, and in the end served only to exacerbate the political chaos and murderous mayhem that now defines Iraq.

Oh, by the way – Sadam is going to be hung…, as I was saying, Bush has the look of a man who can’t help getting in his own way. The Baker commission’s leaked suggestions are logical and seem like a reasonable way out of the current policy of digging deeper into quicksand. Bush better give up his stay the course bullshit now and ease out while the easing is still somewhat "good."

Oh yea. Before I forget to ask – where the hell is what’s his name, ummm, Karl Rove these days? Funny how reality has a way of transcending even the most brilliantly conceived bullshit.

It seems there are only two ways you can go from hero to goat that quickly; professional sports, and professional politics.

Monday, November 27, 2006

Tired of Getting Sand Kicked in Our Faces

There is no sand storm powerful enough to obfuscate the vision of Maureen Dowd, as she once again demonstrates here:

No One to Lose To

Friday, November 24, 2006

...When Fact is Fiction and TV Reality...

W. never made more sense.

Can you say IRONIC?

Friday, November 10, 2006

...What He Said

It's The New York Times Free SELECT week - read up!

"The Great Revulsion"

Paul Krugman Gives You a Piece of my Mind

Thursday, November 09, 2006





Wednesday, November 08, 2006

GOING, GOING, ........


Looks like we're off to a good start.

Tuesday, November 07, 2006



I am sorry about Lincoln Chafee (R) Sen. Rhode Island - he voted with his head, not his party.
He's just a victim of the rolling wave of national discontent.

Let's hope for some sanity going forward.

Pelosi WILL rise to the occasion.

...and away we go...

Monday, November 06, 2006

Insulting Our Troops, and Our Intelligence - New York Times

It's The New York Times Free Select week, so read up.

Frank Rich, NYT columnist, author of the recently
published "The Greatest Story Ever Sold."

...need I say more?

Insulting Our Troops, and Our Intelligence - New York Times

Sunday, November 05, 2006

READY, AIM, .........


The Bushster, under mounting pressure to put Rummy out to pasture where he can do no further harm, decided instead to congratulate him in true "heckuva job" fashion last week.

Luv to Luv U Rummy

Apparently, with the Army Times, The Navy Times, The Air Force Times, and the Marine Corp Times joining the New York Times (the paper most likely to short out Cheney's pace maker) demanding Rummy's ouster, the president may soon find himself in a very small minority.


Of course, calls for Rummy's resignation go way back...

Why Iraq Was a Mistake by Lieut. Gen. Greg Newbold (Ret.)

Three Retired Generals Demand Rumsfeld's Resignation

More Retired Generals Call for Rumsfeld's Resignation

The consistent level of incompetence Rummy has demonstrated is nothing short of criminal. This man is a demented megalomanic Nixonian relic who is fighting the Vietnam war all over again, expecting a different result.


God Help America

Thursday, November 02, 2006


I recently posted part of John Kerry's initial response regarding his "stuck in Iraq" comment, a non-issue, non-story which the press subsequently turned into a major news event. Slow news week?? More like like prime pirranah time.

While Kerry was serving up the president some well deserved fresh hell, a desperate, otherworldly GOP gleefully turned the dial of their bullshit machine to > DISTRACTION TACTICS.

With so much at stake this Nov. 7th, and republicans racing away from the burning Bush, anything was better than an endless news cycle of Tom Foley sexcapades (the repubs have that poor bastard bound, gagged and locked away in "treatment" somewhere and won't let him out until Nov. 8th), the continued chaotic slaughter that is the Iraq war of choice, the Abramoff scandal, etc., etc.

What better way to take the public's mind off the monumental failures of the current majority party? Create a fake controversy, of course!

I was sidelined by a trip to the emergency room - (just a sprain, whew!!) - then, out of the blue, from a friend who is one of the last people I would expect to send me anything political, I receive an email containing what I consider to be THE LAST WORD about this trumped-up, overblown nonsense.

If you read this site at all, you have undoubtedly come across Keith Olbermann links. This is a guy from another time - I can picture him in black and white, smoking a cigarette, and working with the likes of Edward R. Murrow - (Olbermann many times uses his tag line "good night and good luck---fitting.)

Here is the link (text and video) to what I believe is the the most intelligent, passionate, and well written response to the most consciousless, condescending, treasonous, vengeful, destructive collective force to ever to "govern" what used to be my country.....BUSH SHOULD APOLOGIZE

and on a personal note...
Tommy, you CAN hear me! Atta' Boy!!!!

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

"Togetherness In Baghdad"

I have always respected George Will as an intellectual who could illuminate me to the point of getting a sense of the Republican argument, and also, as a very objective conservative.

Here is his essay in the November 6th issue of Newsweek - objectivity blazing.

Togetherness in Baghdad

"Dying to Save the GOP Congress"

Once again, the incomparable Frank Rich conveys the obvious with skill and eloquence.

Please forward this link to anyone who you believe may have gone temporarily insane and believes a vote for the Republicans is a vote for the future...

Dying to Save the GOP Congress

Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Give 'em Hell Kerry!

Quote of the Day:

“This is the classic GOP playbook,” Kerry said in a harshly worded statement. “I’m sick and tired of these despicable Republican attacks that always seem to come from those who never can be found to serve in war, but love to attack those who did. I’m not going to be lectured by a stuffed suit White House mouthpiece standing behind a podium.”

Read the AP story, including video, here:
Go Johnny Go!